The effect of the context in clarifying the summaries, weighing the possibilities, and deciding the obvious (Sultan Alolama' as a Model) An Empirical Study

Abstract

The idea of ​​the research at first was to determine the importance of the context as it is an asset considered by scholars and fundamentalists in particular, as it has a great impact on the interpretation of fundamentalist texts, and its impact appears in the investigations of words from the uttered and understood, the overall and the interpreted, the command, the prohibition, the general and specific, the absolute and the restricted, and this The fundamentalist effect has its impact on the branches, through jurisprudence issues, and it is decided by scholars that contextual evidence is verbal and maqam, and this has no effect in determining the meaning intended from the context of speech. And I saw a clear interest in the context of Imam Al-Aziz through his statements, as he said: “The context is a guide to clarifying the generalities, weighing the probabilities, and deciding the obvious, and all of that is by definition of use.” These three have been addressed in addition to the impact of context on deletion and the impact of context specification, I concluded with a number of results, including that Imam Al-Ezz was an encyclopedist, and he used context in his books as it is one of the fundamentals investigations, and it is often used in the indefinite in the context of the conditional, and that the context for the fundamentalists has multiple names such as (speech context, system context, clear pronunciation, marketed for speech The word market) which is understood from the discourse by means of presumptions, and it helps to explain the outline, clarify what is meant by it and understand it correctly, clarifies what has been formed from the words, establishes the clear from the text and the apparent, guards the meaning and guides on what is omitted from speech if there is evidence for it and is dedicated to some of its requirements.